As I read
the assigned texts for this week, I recalled a conversation with someone who
was a school psychologist. She was
somewhat dismayed that the majority of her time in the schools was spent
administering tests. Yet this was how
the school district utilized her as she traveled to several schools within the
district. This did not mesh well with
what she had hoped to do as a school psychologist. However, this would seem to be consistent
with the findings in the Giordano (1997) article. In the article they reported that most
testing in a school became the responsibility of the school psychologist, with
the school counselor doing very little testing.
District protocol and precedent not withstanding, I am wondering whether
testing might also be an important task for the school counselor. As we have learned, testing seems to benefit
from occurring within the context of a continuing counseling relationship. Oftentimes, it is the counselor who has the
opportunity for that continuing relationship.
Yet many instruments may require training beyond the scope of most
school counselors. I would imagine that
fiscal issues might stand in the way of training and purchasing for many
assessments. I was intrigued, yet not
surprised that counselors tended to utilize a very limited number of
assessments, and many of them were the old standards. In the end practicality often supersedes
other concerns or desires. It would seem
that there was no disagreement about the benefit of assessment, but the
difficulty comes in putting things into practice.
Reference
Giordano, Fransesca G.,
Schwiebert, Valerie L. (1997) School counselors' perceptions of the usefulness
of standardized tests, frequency of their use, School Counselor. Vol. 44, Issue 3.
No comments:
Post a Comment