High
stakes testing has become a dominant feature of the schools in the United
States. Having watched my children go
through school, some before the era of No Child Left Behind, and others after,
I have certainly noticed a difference. However,
besides the newspaper articles and endless debate on the ramifications of the NCLB,
I have not noticed a drastic change in my children’s education. There may have been a greater emphasis on
metrics for reading in elementary school.
But otherwise I have not been aware of a great difference. Although many teachers malign the differences
that it has prompted in their manner of teaching as well as the pressure it
puts on them, I have not observed the same complaints from my children. They have noticed more the pressure that
their teachers seem to feel at the annual testing time. They have often commented, with some
puzzlement, how their teachers seem particularly nervous during the weeks of
high stakes testing. Of course for many
of the teachers, it is nerve-wracking.
Teachers often feel the pressure of student’s producing good test scores
because this will be a reflection on them.
Some teachers have told me that much of their job evaluation rests on
these tests. And a poor administration
of the tests can also be criteria for job termination in some districts. Teachers feel enormous pressure. But, I’m not so sure the students feel
it. For the students, finals or midterms
are often much more of a high stakes testing time.
However
when the book talked about looking at an environmental assessment when
considering student achievement, I had to wonder how the stress that teachers
feel during and leading up to the high stakes testing might impact students. Students are not oblivious to the pressure
their teachers under. It is part of the
equation that impacts their learning along with the many other variables that
come together to foster learning. I can
certainly understand why teachers feel an immense amount of pressure leading up
to testing time because these are certainly high stakes tests for them and for
the school as a whole. But it is
interesting to parse out for whom the tests are really high stakes, in order to
get a better handle on the adverse impact of such tests on the learning
environment. As with any assessment it
certainly seems worth reviewing the purpose of the assessment, and whether it
is meeting its stated intention, and whether the cost is worth the gain. The value of high stakes testing for students
(SAT, PSAT, etc.) and the value of high stakes testing for teachers and schools
(such as STAR tests, PSSA’s, etc.) is certainly worth assessing repeatedly to
be sure they serve the intended purpose.
Drummond, R. J.
and Jones, K. (2010). Assessment
Procedures for Counselors and Helping Professionals. Upper Saddle River,
New Jersey: Pearson Education, Inc.
No comments:
Post a Comment