When
reading chapter 11 I was taken back to the Career Development course. I find Holland’s theory interesting and
relevant. It seems that for every
category I am able to identify someone who strongly fits. I remember when taking Career
Development I gave my husband the Self-Directed Search to complete, predicting
ahead of time that his code would be RIA, just from knowing his skills,
personality, and interests. After
taking the test, I realized that my hypothesis was correct. Either the test is extremely valid or I
very accurately know my husband, or both!
I
find it good to know that a Dictionary of Occupational Titles (DOT)
exists. I have had a little
experience with the O*Net, the online version of the DOT. It is helpful that it is coded to show
how much education and training are needed for each of the 12,000+ occupations.
This could be a very helpful tool even now for me with transition planning for
my students’ IEPs. I can see how
this will be an imperative tool for high school counselors. Reading through the section on career
assessment, I was surprised to see that nothing was mentioned about the program
that my school uses, Career Cruising.
I wonder what the validity and reliability data are on this assessment.
The
work value inventory is something that I have no experience with. It seems like a great idea, but is
there a corresponding list of careers that most closely match a person’s top
three or four work values? And if
there is, it seems as though one would need to proceed with caution, as a job
in one particular workplace may have very different working conditions than the
same job in a different workplace, most notably in the areas of co-workers,
income, security, supervision, and workplace.
I
did not realize that there was validity and reliability data for
interviews. I did have a very
structured interview once. I remember that there were many questions and some
of them seemed rather arbitrary.
For example, I remember them asking me something to the extent of, “What
is an idea that you’ve had recently?”
I have heard many times before that interviewers decide whether they
like the interviewee early on in the interview, and that nonverbal cues are
weighed more heavily than verbal.
In other words, it isn’t always what you say; it’s how you present
yourself. It is slightly troubling
that negatives tend to be weighed more heavily than the positives, but I
suppose that is how employers need to more efficiently narrow their choices.
Overall
I can see how this chapter will be a valuable resource if I become a secondary
counselor or do anything related with career counseling.
Drummond, R. J. & Jones, K.
(2010). Assessment procedures for counselors and helping
professionals.
(7th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ:Pearson.